, pub-5193898349613817, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
22.7 C
New York
Wednesday, May 31, 2023

The VAR Overview: Lindelof, Kiwior handball penalties

Video Assistant Referee causes controversy each week within the Premier League, however how are selections made, and are they appropriate?

After every weekend we check out the main incidents, to look at and clarify the method each by way of VAR protocol and the Legal guidelines of the Recreation.

How VAR selections affected each Prem membership in 2022-23
VAR within the Premier League: Final information

On this week’s VAR Overview: Ought to West Ham United have been given a penalty for handball towards Manchester United defender Victor Lindelof? Was it appropriate to disallow their aim for a foul by Michail Antonio on David de Gea? Why was Newcastle United‘s penalty towards Arsenal cancelled? And when is a penalty a comfortable penalty?

Potential penalty: Handball by Lindelof

What occurred: In first-half stoppage time with West Ham already 1-0 up, Stated Benrahma tried to cross into the world and the ball hit the arm of Manchester United centre-back Victor Lindelof. Referee Peter Bankes waved away appeals for a penalty and United broke up subject.

VAR choice: No penalty.

VAR overview: The complicated state of the handball regulation, the record of mitigating elements which a VAR should take note of and the excessive threshold for intervention all come collectively on this incident, that means West Ham had been denied a penalty that ought to have been awarded.

Having a excessive threshold is meant to restrict the impression upon the sport, however it might additionally trigger a VAR to generally overthink an incident, when an overturn is the extra apparent final result. A VAR will be searching for a purpose to not change a subjective choice, slightly than obtain the outcome which most followers and gamers would count on.

With the excessive bar additionally comes restricted use of the pitchside monitor, which is there for a referee to vary his choice and never simply to take a re-examination. So, the VAR will not simply ship the referee over if he thinks it is likely to be flawed — he should be sure it was incorrect.

The VAR for this recreation, Stuart Attwell, has utilized the exemption clause that the participant’s arm was not away from his physique, and the ball would have hit his chest if it hadn’t hit his hand. The logic is he hasn’t prevented the ball from reaching its supposed vacation spot, as a result of it will have been stopped by his physique. Nevertheless, the obvious deliberate motion of the arm to the ball by Lindelof trumps this, and a penalty ought to have been the end result.

On Monday, the Premier League will for the very first time launch the audio of some VAR contentious selections in a pilot present, supposed to enhance transparency. Having the ability to hear how selections have been reached can be an enormous step ahead, although its unlikely to assist in conditions resembling this when the VAR has arrived on the flawed final result.

Howard Webb, the chief refereeing officer, intends to roll this out extra often this season, however it might solely be in days following a match as FIFA nonetheless forbids any competitors from enjoying out the VAR discussions reside.

Potential aim: Foul by Antonio on De Gea

What occurred: Within the 52nd minute, West Ham thought they’d scored a second aim when Michail Antonio challenged David de Gea, and poked dwelling the free ball. Nevertheless, referee Bankes disallowed the aim for a foul on the goalkeeper.

VAR choice: No aim.

VAR overview: Maybe one of many softer fouls we’re prone to see, however when a striker places himself able whereby the goalkeeper can’t use his arms to get to the ball, it is all the time prone to be given and definitely will not be reversed by the VAR.

That stated, De Gea hasn’t all the time benefitted from such selections. In December 2019 he conceded a aim towards Everton in seemingly an identical situation. On that event the foul wasn’t given when Dominic Calvert-Lewin had his arm throughout the Spain worldwide; the VAR backed that up and did not intervene to disallow it.

Penalty overturn: No handball by Kiwior

What occurred: Newcastle United thought they had been about to have the possibility to take the lead from the penalty within the seventh minute when referee Chris Kavanagh penalised Jakub Kiwior for handball after a shot by Bruno Guimaraes. The VAR needed to test there was an offence.

VAR choice: Penalty cancelled.

VAR overview: It took fairly some time for the VAR, Michael Salisbury, to resolve to ship the referee to the monitor to overturn his choice in what appeared to be a reasonably straight-forward overview.

It quickly grew to become obvious that the ball got here off Kiwior’s thigh, and even when it then did go on to the touch his arm it wasn’t away from the physique. Additionally, if a participant is pulling his arm into his physique that carries an exemption towards handball. The one attainable case for the spot kick can be if Kiwior had intentionally moved his arm to the ball, slightly than simply attempting to tuck it into his physique.

It took too lengthy, nearly three minutes from award to cancellation, however the correct choice was reached in the long run.

Potential penalty: Silva foul on Solanke

What occurred: Within the 67th minute, Dominic Solanke felt he ought to have been awarded a penalty kick when taking place below a deal with from Thiago Silva. Referee John Brooks turned down the enchantment.

VAR choice: No penalty.

VAR overview: The primary of a collection of penalty selections this weekend which go proper to the center of VAR protocol, and when an intervention is predicted.

From Silva’s problem the ball moved out to the correct, which may have given the referee the impression that the Chelsea defender acquired the ball.

Nevertheless, replays confirmed that it was in reality Solanke who acquired the contact, so does that make it a transparent and apparent error? If the incident hasn’t performed out because the referee describes to the VAR, does that routinely imply he ought to be despatched to the monitor? That may in all probability be the case if there was a decrease threshold for intervention, however within the Premier League the VAR, on this case Peter Bankes, can be searching for a smoking gun. Can he actually be sure that there’s a foul problem, even when the defender did not in reality contact the ball?

Any contact from Silva on Solanke would have been very slight, so even when the referee thought the defender did get to the ball it would not be thought of an error to not give the penalty kick. However as we see within the subsequent match, proof of contact may also imply an awarded penalty should stand, even when the award is comfortable.

Potential penalty overturn: Surridge foul on Lavia

What occurred: Southampton had been handed a penalty within the 94th minute. Referee Michael Oliver pointed to the spot after he noticed contact from Sam Surridge on the boot of Romeo Lavia. However was there sufficient on this for a penalty?

VAR choice: Penalty stands, scored by James Ward-Prowse.

VAR overview: A really comfortable penalty, however as soon as the referee has awarded it and the VAR, Paul Tierney, has recognized contact by defender on attacker, then the penalty should stand.

If Oliver hadn’t awarded the penalty then it is not possible it will have been given by the VAR — simply as was the case with Solanke. As a result of the extent of contact was negligible, it would not be thought of a transparent and apparent error to not give the penalty. However as a result of contact was current, it is not a transparent and apparent error to award it. You possibly can forgive followers for being confused about this.

Protocol is similar throughout leagues proper as much as UEFA competitions.

Potential penalty overturn: Leno foul on Vardy

What occurred: Leicester Metropolis had been awarded a penalty within the sixty fourth minute when Jamie Vardy acquired to the ball forward of Fulham goalkeeper Bernd Leno, and was then introduced down. Referee Robert Jones pointed to the penalty spot.

VAR choice: Penalty stands, missed by Vardy.

VAR overview: One other overview which appeared to take far longer than was mandatory with the VAR, Jarred Gillett, taking a look at a number of completely different angles to attempt to detect if Leno had acquired a contact on the ball earlier than he collided with Vardy.

A penalty gave the impression to be the proper choice from the primary replay, and it is questionable if it might have been thought of a transparent and apparent error to offer the spot kick if the VAR was needing to take a look at so many alternative angles for proof of a contact.

Potential penalty overturn: Palhinha foul on Maddison

What occurred: Leicester had been awarded a second penalty within the eightieth minute when James Maddison gave the impression to be tripped when he checked again inside to go previous Joao Palhinha — however the Fulham participant was adamant he hadn’t touched the midfielder.

VAR choice: Penalty stands, scored by Maddison.

VAR overview: For all Palhinha’s protestations, there was particular contact on Maddison, with the Fulham midfielder leaving a trailing leg to cease his progress.

Like different on-field penalties awarded this weekend, there was no probability of a VAR overturn. Contact was there and the penalty had been awarded, so it will not be overturned.

Potential penalty overturn: Struijk foul on Foden

What occurred: Phil Foden gained a penalty within the 83rd minute when he was introduced down by Pascal Struijk and referee Andy Madley pointed to the spot. There was a fast test of the choice by the VAR, Simon Hooper.

VAR choice: Penalty stands, missed by Ilkay Gundogan.

VAR overview: The response of the Leeds United participant stated every little thing about this, with Struijk clearly enjoying the person slightly than the ball. Struijk locations his left leg throughout Foden, which forces the Man Metropolis participant to the bottom.

It will all the time stand as a penalty, and no purpose for the VAR to get entangled.

Info supplied by the Premier League and PGMOL was used on this story.

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles